As with most things, it seems, the answer is: “It depends.” Glad we cleared that up? Just kidding…
The answer to how many calories you ought to consume on a daily basis depends on a number of factors including your age, gender, current body weight, height, activity level, and your health and fitness goals. As you are likely aware, not only are there a number of formulas out there for calculating your daily caloric requirements, but diet myths and “one size fits all” caloric prescriptions abound. Ever hear that women should consume around 2000 calories per day, and men around 2500? Or, that in order to lose weight, you should reduce your caloric intake to 1200 or 1500 calories per day — regardless of your gender? That last one might work, if you are short, petite framed, and sedentary. But what if I told you that dropping your caloric intake that low might backfire and either prevent you from losing weight all together, or cause you to lose weight in the form of lean muscle tissue instead of losing body fat? That’s NOT GOOD.
Let’s apply some common sense to this question, and start by determining how many calories we should consume just to support our bodies on a daily basis. From there, we will have a starting point from which to determine how we should alter this intake in order to either gain muscle or lose fat.
As I’ve said already, the number of calories you need to consume in order to meet your body’s basic needs (ie, maintain your body weight) will depend on a number of factors. The taller and heavier you are, ie, the bigger you are, the more calories you burn. Intuitively, this makes sense. The more of you there is to move, the more fuel (ie, calories) is required to support the movement. This is why four-year-olds don’t eat portion sizes as large as teenagers AND why SUVs tend to burn more gasoline than compact cars. The amount of calories you burn also depends on how much you move and what type of movement you participate in. This also makes perfect sense. A desk jockey will, by necessity, require less fuel to get through the day than a construction worker, beat cop, grocery stocker, or NFL lineman. The more demanding your job, the more calories you burn while at work. The same principle applies to stay-at-home moms. Anyone else ever chase a two-year-old for an afternoon? Talk about exhausting work! Much more physically taxing, say, than watching an eight-year-old play soccer from the bleachers. Exercise also factors in here. Going for a 30-minute walk every morning will increase the amount of calories you burn throughout the day, but not as much as if you went jogging, performed some high intensity intervals, or pounded out some heavy resistance training. In other words, both the quantity and intensity of your physical activity will affect your daily caloric requirement. One additional factor is also critical to determining our daily intake needs: the amount of lean muscle tissue we carry in our body. Muscle is high-maintenance, calorie-hungry, calorie-burning tissue. The more of it we have, the more we will need to eat in order to feed and preserve that tissue. Ultimately, this is why the Fitness Commander is such an advocate for resistance training: building muscle burns calories — both in the gym AND later, at rest. But, I digress… Point is, people with greater amounts of lean muscle tissue will require more calories throughout the day than people with less lean muscle tissue. This is why men tend to burn more calories than women, and why young people tend to burn more calories than older people.
So now that we have established the calorie-requirement fundamentals, how do we go about determining our individual caloric needs?
Of the multitude of formulas out there for determining our daily caloric requirement, studies indicate the Mifflin-St. Joer equation to be the most reliable (Nix, 2009). No surprise, this is likely because the formula attempts to factor in gender, age, height, weight, and physical activity level. The Mifflin-St. Joer equations for men and women are below. In order to calculate your caloric requirement, you will need to convert your height from inches to centimeters and your weight from pounds to kilograms. Remember that 1 kilogram is equal to 2.2 pounds, and 1 inch is equal to 2.54 centimeters.
MEN: [(Weight in kilograms x 10) + (Height in cm x 6.25) - (Age x 5) -5] x Physical Activity Level (PA)
WOMEN: [(Weight in kilograms x 10) + (Height in cm x 6.25) - (Age x 5) -161] x Physical Activity Level (PA)
Use the following to determine your physical activity level, or PA:
- 1.2 = Sedentary (little or no exercise)
- 1.375 = Light Active (light exercise or sports 1-3 days per week)
- 1.55 = Moderately Active (moderate exercise or sports 1-3 days per week)
- 1.725 = Very Active (hard exercise or sports 6-7 days per week)
- 1.9 = Extra Active (Hard exercise or sports PLUS a physically demanding job)
Using the Fitness Commander for an example, let’s give this formula a shot. I am 5’2″ tall (157 cm), and weigh 122 pounds (55.45 kg). I am 34 years old, and I spend between 9 and 11 hours in the gym each week – when I am not lifting and racking and demonstrating exercises as a personal trainer.
[(55.45 kg x 10) + (157 cm x6.25) - (34 years x 5) - 161] x 1.9 =
(554 + 981 – 170- 161) x 1.9 =
1204 x 1.9 = 2287
According to the Mifflin-St. Joer equation, I burn approximately 2287 calories per day, and therefore need to consume 2287 calories per day in order to maintain my body weight. A word of caution here, however. Because I wear a bodybug, which monitors my caloric burn from day-to-day, I know that I actually burn closer to 2500 calories per day — and up to 3000 calories per day when I both train clients and do high intensity interval training. So if this calculation is so accurate, what accounts for the shortfall when I run my own numbers? Probably my low percentage of body fat. The Mifflin St. Jeor equation assumes that because I am a woman, I burn fewer calories at rest than a man of the same size — who presumably would carry more calorie-burning lean body mass than “the average woman.” When I run my statistics through the male calculation, I generate a daily caloric requirement of 2584 calories — almost spot-on for my daily burn.
Let’s do this equation again, based on the statics of my good friend. Let’s call him Borris. Borris is 43 years old, 6′ 2″ tall and weighs 220 pounds. His occupation primarily keeps him behind a desk, but he works out between 3 -4 times each week — running, swimming, biking and/or lifting weights.
[(100 kg x 10) + (188 cm x6.25) - (43 years x 5) - 5] x 1.55 =
(1000 + 1175 – 215 – 5) x 1.55 =
1955 x 1.55 = 3030
What do these results suggest? First, they suggest, in accord with the principles above, that Borris requires more calories per day than I do for at least two reasons: he’s bigger than I am, and he’s male. The fact that I can burn a Borris-like number of calories over the course of a busy workout day is a tribute to both my body composition, and the fact that I NEVER stand still. (Incidentally, were Borris to follow me around and mimic my daily routine, he would burn an astounding 3714 calories in 24 hours! Cheeseburger, anyone?) The fact that my caloric burn is more accurately calculated using the male equation suggests that female athletes and women with greater amounts of lean body mass run the risk of having their daily caloric requirement calculated too low using the Mifflin St. Jeor formula for women.
Ok, so now that we know how to predict our daily caloric requirement, what do we do with this information? Again, the answer is “it depends.”
FOR MAINTENANCE: If your goal is to maintain your body weight, calculate your daily caloric requirement using the formulas above and stick to consuming roughly that number of calories every day.
FOR FAT LOSS: In order to reduce body fat by one pound per week (a safe rate of reduction according to most experts), you need to consume 3500 fewer calories than you burn over the course of the seven days. For those of you ahead of me on the math, that comes out to a daily calorie deficiency of 500 calories. Therefore, in order to calculate how many calories you need to consume in order to lose one pound of fat per week, plug your numbers into the gender-appropriate formula above and subtract 500. Two caveats, however, to bear in mind: First, don’t be tempted by the impulse to increase this deficit by more than 500 calories. It is not safe to reduce body weight by more than 1% per week. This means that if you weigh less than 200 pounds, losing weight at a rate of 2 pounds per week or more could be unsafe. Ergo, please don’t calculate your daily need and try and speed up the process by reducing your caloric intake by 1000, 1500, or more. Also, consider that it takes less than 48 hours for the body to down-regulate metabolism. What does that mean? It means that when you reduce your daily caloric intake too drastically, your body will adjust and begin to burn fewer calories throughout the day — almost immediately. If this happens, expect your weight loss to come to a grinding halt! Second, remember that exercise is a key part of the Mifflin St. Jeor equation. Therefore, if you increase your exercise in addition to decreasing your caloric intake, you are again running the risk of metabolic down-grade. If you plan on increasing your daily calorie burn by 250 calories per day through increased exercise, decrease your caloric intake by 250 (not 500) calories to stay at a net deficit of 500 calories per day.
FOR MUSCLE GAIN: The formula for determining caloric intake to support lean muscle growth is slightly less clear-cut than the formula for fat loss. In general, however, the same principle applies. In order to gain one pound of lean muscle mass per week, you would need to calculate your daily caloric intake according the formulas above and exceed that number by 500 calories. Yes, in order to gain muscle weight, you generally need to get your body into a calorie surplus. However, muscle gain is also dependent on factors including sleep and the quality of both your workouts and your nutrition. In other words, if you increase your daily caloric intake by 500 calories but skip the gym, forgo adequate sleep, and binge on Cheetos, it won’t be muscle weight that shows up on the scale. Strenuous weight training is also required in order to gain
significant amounts of lean body mass. By definition, engaging in strenuous strength training burns a great deal of calories. Therefore, for some individuals, a 500-calorie-per-day surplus may not be sufficient to merit muscle gains of 1 pound per week. For these people, a calorie surplus of 750 calories per day may be warranted.
So there you have it: Calorie-calculating math from the Fitness Commander…
Yours in good health.